Monday, February 28, 2005
 
What does Heaven look like?
So, I saw "Constantine" recently (in fact, I saw it twice, because I love the story), and I noticed something odd. Well, odd in the societal sense, not in the "why is there a demon riding on the bus?" sense. There's already plenty of that.

In this movie, there are a plethora of demons. There's a scene with a swarm of them in the air, a weird demon made up of bugs and vermin, the eurotrash demon, and the standard group of Anne Rice-vampire demons (what is the collective term for vampires? A pride? A gaggle? A murder? No, I think I'll use 'a clutch of vampires'). In fact, the movie even ranks demons and gives them names (Half-breed, soldier demon, Balthazar).

Two angels. Two. And only one gets a name. Now, granted, that angel is a pretty pivotal part of the story (and my personal favorite character). Still, only two angels in the entire story. The neutral witch doctor gets more screen time than they do.

In "Constantine" we spend roughly 2-3 minutes in Hell. And I must say, they did a damn fine job representing Hell. However, while the movie makes multiple trips to hell and spends about two percent of it's film-time there, we only get to see Heaven for about ten seconds. Heaven is seen from a great distance, and we just get a vague idea what it's like.

The devil gets about 3-5 minutes of airtime. He cavorts and japes, and pretty much acts like you would expect the devil to act (although, I don't get that outfit). He chats, he deals, he whines and threatens. Meanwhile, God doesn't even get a walk-on role.

I guess, what I'm getting at is, why is it so much easier to display evil than it is to display good? We get evil in movies and TV all the time. To use Keanu in another example, the movie "Devil's Advocate" spends the entire time revolving around the devil (masterfully played by Al Pacino), while not showing a single minion of God. Pacino raves against God, but we get no rebuttal.

Now that I think of it, there are so many examples, it's funny. We seem to take evil seriously, but we barely touch on good.

From the dark side, The Omen, The Exorcist, The Prophecy, Legend. From the side of good, Bruce Almighty, Angels in the Outfield, Touched by an Angel, and Heaven can Wait. So, the Devil is horror and drama, God is sappy comedy.

Sadly, the last movie I can think of that really explored the nature of "good", or dared to feature God as a serious character, was a John Freakin' Denver movie!!!

That's right. Go watch the old "Oh, God" movie again. It's dated, but the part where George Burns starts answering questions is sheer genius. It stands out because you had a Hollywood movie that actively presented God's position.

It seems like you can only show God in one of two ways. The first is to make a movie that trivializes God to a simplistic caricature of a spunky grandfather (see Bruce Almighty). This is the route that almost all movies will take. It's safe, it tests well in the bible belt, and doesn't offend anyone.

The other way is to make a ballsy movie that speaks unflinchingly about your own personal view of God. Let's call this the "Passion of the Christ" method. While it is incredibly one-sided and exclusionary, this method is the best way we, as a culture, can advance. And, when it is done with the fervor that Mel feels for his God, it can make the world take notice.

If I can digress for a moment, I should also note another great film, forwarding the cause of religious thinking, "Dogma". It may seem odd to talk about one of Kevin Smith's Jay & Silent Bob movies as a serious treatise on religion, but just look at the story. We have fallen angels, the metatron, cherubim and a muse. We see a 13th apostle, and discuss the idea that Jesus was black. As far as making people think about religion, I think Dogma was incredible (however, they really dropped the ball when Alanis Morissette showed up).

Anyway, back to God's screen time. Think of what Hell looks like. There, that was easy, wasn't it? Lots of smoke, fire, dark caves with dangerous looking stalactites, people being whipped for no reason, or doing manual labor that has no purpose, guys with pitchforks laughing as they torture people, and a red filter over the whole thing. Easy!

Now, picture Heaven. No, really think about what it's like. Not as easy, is it? Most people picture Olympus, with everyone standing on clouds, wearing togas for some odd reason, and constantly watching the panoply of human strife. Do they have books in Heaven? If so, why? Don't you have access to all knowledge and wisdom? Do they play sports, and if so, how do they get around the idea of violent competition? Do they listen to real music, or is it really just harps? Why togas?

The problem is that people have a really good idea of what Hell is like, because they just lump together all the things they hate about Earth into one experience. However, they can't really picture Heaven, because most people define 'good' as a lack of evil. How do you lump a "lack of evil" into one experience, without making it look incredibly boring?

And what about God? When most people think of God, the first thing they think of is asking questions. The really religious people will think of supplicating first, but eventually, they come around to the idea of asking the questions that never seem to be appropriately answered (why must innocent children die? Why must people suffer at all?). Would it be possible to come up with a character that actually can answer these questions, can expand people's understanding of what it means to be good, and even make it seem attractive to people? Could you really make a character who is good, and inspires people to emulate him? Inspires them to give of themselves?

I think most writers say, No. They really can't. Or at least, it's just too hard to try. And that's how we get things like "Bruce Almighty".

By the way, if you ever get a chance, check out the British mini-series called "The Second Coming". It's about a guy who, on his 30th birthday, realizes that he is the son of God. The show asks the question, if Jesus came back now, would we be able to handle it? What would we do? The show takes no easy shortcuts, it flinches from no difficult questions, and it seriously makes you think about religion.

, , ,

Comments:
dogma was an amazing movie, highly underrated if you ask me.
maybe one of the reasons that we represent evil easier, is simply coz we're all inherently evil. being good is too much trouble, and is a little boring too.
asking those questions, and expecting answers involves seeing it all from a completely radical paradigm; one that can actually make you go mad. and since seeing bad is easier from where we are now, we simply stick with it.
which if you think about it, is not all that bad anyway. i guess, in some ways, we're drifting towards a time where we have bad and worse, good won't exist.
or maybe its that way anyway.
 
Gotta agree .. Dogma was a good movie and did bring up the questions that some people refuse to even acknowledge let alone answer.

I think that the world in general is rife with indifference ... yes there is always the the coming together of people from all over the world when something tragic happens like the Tsunami but mostly I think that people are indifferent to what really goes on.

I think Marilyn Manson in Michael Moore's movie Bowling for Colombine said it best when he said that there is a community of fear. People are afraid to get to know others that don't fit into their own view of the world, they are afraid to accept what is different. Its easier to hate than it is to accept.

Of course this is just my 2 cents worth ;o)
 
here is my 2 cents; we are all scum and all our ideas of god prove it. COME ON! the people who make it to heaven are not going to ask a damn thing. come on can you see mother T. or the pope asking a thing. and as for good being boring...that says it all! only sinful person like me would say that and i know i going to hell. enuff said.!
 
I gotta admit, I'm a little disappointed by the negativity shown here. I've met several sincerely good people, and while I've never been able to understand how they do it, I've certainly never dismissed them outright with phrases like "People are scum" or "being good is too much trouble". Being good is an incredible challenge, one that most of us are not up to, but I won't ignore the challenge, or give up with a cop-out like, "I know I'm going to hell."

I can't claim to know what Mother Theresa says to God, or what the Pope would do, but I do know what I would do, and I have an idea what the average person would do. What would you do, if faced with God?

The truly good people I've met have never been bored. Their lives are filled with activity. That comes from spending so much time volunteering and helping people. They see new places all the time, work a full day when they help out, and meet new people that they genuinely consider friends. They are surrounded by people who owe them kindnesses, and they never have trouble finding a group of friends to hang out.

I know nihilism is trendy these days. Nihilism is this year's black. However, there is a rebellious streak in me that will always fight against the direction that everyone else is moving. A part of me that scrutinizes anything popular more harshly than the unpopular things.

I guess that means that in a world populated by lazy negativism, this atheist will have to fight for belief in good people.
 
i was trying a very tongue-in-cheek response to the post, but i guess the words never actually came out the way i wanted them to.
indeed, for me the two co-exist, and good/bad is not really defined. the viewpoint is all that changes.
while i agree that being good is not the "in" thing now, i will say that it is probably because we find it easier to ignore the conscience than the "rewards" we reap on the other route.
i say cynicism is going to be death of "good" as we know it, or as we define it. a reality where the picture is blurred is more possible; regardless of what ideals we follow. that too, is cynical, and possibly a little optimistic, but put that down to the mood i'm in now.
 
Great illustration of an issue that few people think enough about. Why is it so much easier for most of us to imagine (visualize) bad things than good things?

My favorite take on the topic is a Mark Twain story called "Captain Stormfield's visit to Heaven". Not only a hoot, but very thought provoking. I wonder how it was received at the time?
 
Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger
Visitors since October 7th, 2004

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.